I would have done R10, had I an even number of drives. I’ve once faced what was essentially an invincible Obstagoon that started out with a whopping ten barriers and would spam Obstruct every turn before brutally destroying everyone when it’d attack the second time. The individual disks will bench (at the beginning of the disk) at about 100 MB/sec for seq reads and about 70 MB/sec for seq writes. I have just got myself an ASRock Z68 Extreme4 Gen3 motherboard with 4 x 3TB drives. Sometimes the problems go away after an insane amount of try and error. Fighting battles against humongous Pokémon is pretty cool on its own, and it's also a great way to get rare Pokémon and valuable items. We have created an overview in regards to the Raid 5 problem: Find the best combination "Stripe vs. Clustersize" for Intel RST in Raid 5 mode (3,4,5 and 6 HDDs Test). So you can’t even put it to sleep or do anything really because it’d kill you before it could even lose its barriers. O ne of the most exciting new features in Pokémon Sword and Pokémon Shield is the Max Raid Battle format that takes place in Galar's Wild Area. By understanding the underlying I/O process, we can understand the theoretical perfor… Max Raid Schedule. Number of disks used and other setings changed made no relevant diference. I had ordered 6 but 2 of them did not pass my tests with the smartctl utility. This is probably the only time online Pays off even if it barely works. I have a SSD drive as my boot drive, so that is separate but I want to run the 4 x 3TB Western Digital Green drives in RAID5. The Ryzen 7 2700X has a base frequency of 3.7 GHz and a maximum boost of 4.35 GHz with a 105 W TDP. CASE:-ML110 G4, CPU:-xeon 4030, COOLER:-stock leaf blower, BOARD:-stock raid 771 board, RAM:-2x2GB 666mhz kingston ECC ddr2, GPU:-9400GT 1GB, PSU:-stock delta, RAID:-JMicron JMB363 card+onboard raid controller, HDD:-320gb hitachi OS, 2xMaxtor 160gb raid1, 500gb samsungSP, 160gb WD, LAPTOP:-Dell n5030, CPU:-replaced s*** cel900 with … I had similar issue with 3 x Hitachi 5k3000 2TB and 2x Samsung HD203WI 2 TB. We have communicated your concerns to the respective department but please be aware that the RAID controller on your system is a software RAID solution, which means that the data stripping is calculated by the processor and using the system resources; in addition the performance may be affected by the hardware used, the rest of the software running on the background and the benchmark application being used or its settings. In terms of RAID, reading is extremely easy … Play with the partition offset more, I really think your problem lies there. Plus, Max Raid Battles have two loss conditions: the battle lasting ten turns or four Pokémon fainting. All I had to do was to change stripe size from 128KB to 64KB and magically read speed increased to ~350MB/s and sustained write speed jumped up to ~170MB/s, which is about twice the speed of a single disk and also twice the speed I need, since I will only feed the raid from single disks. RAID 10 requires four drives, with each pair of drives first being mirrored (RAID 1), then striped (RAID 0). In other words: The RST driver is crap and Intel doesn't care. RAID on CPU. Per informazioni più complete sulle ottimizzazioni del compilatore, vedere: Avviso di ottimizzazione. In this article, I want to explore the common RAID levels of RAID 0, 5, 6, and 10 to see how performance differs between them. Read perf = 86% (258/300) of theoretical maximum (per filebench), Write perf = 74% (156/210) of theoretical maximum (per filebench). running it natively on Linux by mdadm --assemble --scan && mdadm -I /dev/md/imsm it always runs blazzingly fast with very little CPU. The theoretcial maximum here is 300 MB/sec read and 210 MB/sec write, so writes are doing a lot worse than reads. Here are the benchmarks for the other raid with the 64k strip size. When my other raid-5 array finishes initializing I'll post its performance numbers as well. Intel RST is a two-faced creature: RAID0 is always fine, RAID1 is always fine, RAID10 is always fine. It has a really big issue with speed. Any additional drives must be added in pairs. Always keep an eye out for game updates to get an indication of what Pokemon you might encounter in these max raids. In the games. Are they okay? Here's a relevant thread: You may want to enable write-back cache to improve the performance as suggested in the article below and by other users in this thread. Posted by 1 year ago. When starting a Max Raid Battle, players can see a silhouette of the Dynamax Pokémon, its types, and a star rating of its difficulty. These are often denoted by a red beam of light coming from the den, but if it is one of the rarer Pokémon it'll have big purple light. There are two subtypes: In RAID-0+1, data is organized as stripes across multiple disks, and then the striped disk sets are mirrored. RAID-10: Combining RAID-0 and RAID-1 is often referred to as RAID-10, which offers higher performance than RAID-1 but at much higher cost as it requires a minimum of four disks. In my oppinion the driver makes poor assumptions or is using bad defaults for some geometry and alignment data. Read speed was ~200-300 MB/s and write speed was 25-30 MB/s. Should there be a new subreddit called r/fuckMartin? Operating System; Support for Windows® 10 64-bit Support for Windows® 7 64-bit * To support Windows® 7 64-bit, you must install an AMD Pinnacle Ridge & Summit Ridge CPU. To use RAID 10, a minimum of four hard drive disks are required. From farming useful TRs, finding Gigantimax Raids, or those sweet sweet XP candies, raids got all your competitive needs. Drop a drive off your array and bench the array keeping all other settings the same, see if it improves in any area. I am aware of the problem with alignment issues affecting performance and hence use 512k sector drives (2TB Hitachi 7k3000). Max Processors Qty 1 ... 1 x CPU 4 x DIMM 288-pin 1 x PCIe 3.0 x16 1 x PCIe 2.0 x16 (x4 mode) 1 x PCIe 2.0 x1 ... SATA-600 -connectors: 6 x 7pin Serial ATA - RAID 0 / RAID 1 / RAID 10 My very simple conclusion is the ichr10 cannot handle 128KB stripe size without extreme write penalty. I will happily take those shinies. RAID storage solutions provide users with a combination of data protection and performance acceleration. - Double checked the disks with smartctl. No change. Supported RAID Levels RAID 0,1,10 for both NVMe and SATA RAID on the above listed AMD products. I would correct above message a little: the RAID1 is definitely not fast. Just to make clear, Linux with native RST-RAID is always fast, Windows RST RAID0+1+10 are always fast, Windows RST RAID5 read is always fast, just Windows RST RAID5 write is sometimes extremly slow. IMHO, you are trying too hard, looking too deep. Platform level constraints may supersede the below: Configurations Maximum x4 PCIe SSD Totals Supported: • 4 Direct Attached SSDs per Intel® VMD domain • 24 SSDs per single Intel® VMD Controller when using switches • 24 SSDs per RAID 0/5 array Also it should support RAID5 for the Intel SATA Controller, so I hoped to replace my "energy eating" Synology DS508 RAID system as well. Amazon.com: Acer Predator Triton 500 Thin & Light Gaming Laptop, Intel Core i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 15.6" Full HD 144Hz 3ms G-Sync IPS Display, 32GB DDR4, 1TB PCIe NVMe SSD RAID 0, RGB KB, PT515-51-765U: Computers & Accessories Try excluding the parity block from your stripe size calculations, don't ask why, just see if that helps. You still lose capacity, but less headaches than R5, and extra redundancy. Maybe for Xmas I'll buy myself another 2 hard drives (one for each array) and see where the numbers go for a 5 disk RAID-5. All fine. I did some additional tests and the only way I was able to get really poor performance was by again seting stripe size to larger than 64KB or inactivating write cache. This performance can be enhanced further by using multiple controllers, ideally one controller per disk. Use something plain for testing like 32KB Cluster/64KB Stripe. I’ve had a Wishiwashi repeatedly use water moves against a water absorb Lapras. This is the place for most things Pokémon on Reddit—TV shows, video games, toys, trading cards, you name it! I do suspect unalignment problems with RAID stripe size and NTFS cluster size and many more. That's all I … Very elusive results, not good enough for general suggestions. I think I must not say that this test needs hours :-(. I thought I'd post the numbers from one of the raid-5 arrays that serve my files at home. I think I got the same guy in a Wigglytuff raid- this time he used a Mimikyu that tried to sabotage us, but I was using a Weezing, so Mimikyu's Shadow Claw wasn't doing much and we still beat the raid. Probably one of the biggest (HA!) For the RAID5 Problem I made the following tests: - Disabled Array and checked all disks in single mode: Read and Write speed was between 80 and 100 MB/sec. Intel’s Virtual RAID On CPU supports up to 20 drives in RAID 0 for free, but if you want more RAID 1 or other redundant setups, you need … But RAID5 is a mystery. Does not fix the problem. Every time I see that stupid rock face, I get frustrated because I know a normal fight is going to be unnecessarily difficult because the stupid stone doesn’t understand that trying to boost its stats is pointless. Most systems seem to run good at RAID-stripe 64k and NTFS-cluster 4k, no system seems to run good at RAID-stripe 128k and some run good at 64k/64k or 32k/16k or 16k/16 or 16k/4k. RAID Levels: Max Drive Support: RAID Support: PowerEdge RAID Controller (PERC) Series 10 PERC H840 Adapter: 12Gb/s SAS: PCI-Express 3.0 2x4 External 8GB NV Flash Backed Cache 0,1,5,6,10,50,60 255 Hardware RAID PERC H740P Adapter: 12Gb/s SAS 6Gb/s SATA PCI-Express 3.0 2x4 Internal 8GB NV Flash Backed Cache 0,1,5,6,10,50,60: 32 Hardware RAID OTOH, If you are done banging your head against this particular wall, do a R10. Finally something clear and simple without some crazy complex graphs and hard to understand formulas. Those limitations are only on ... CPU: i7-2600K 4751MHz 1 ... Seasonic X-660 80+ Gold Case: Antec P110 Silent, 5 intakes 1 exhaust Monitor: AOC G2460PF 1080p 144Hz (150Hz max w/ DP, 121Hz max … Package Includes: AMD RAID Drivers AMD RAIDXpert Utility The array consists of 4 2 TB seagate 5900 RPM disks using a strip size of 128K and a 4K cluster size on the filesystem. http://www.intel.com/support/chipsets/imsm/sb/cs-009337.htm# raid5 Intel® Rapid Storage Technology (Intel® RST) — RAID 0, 1, 5, 10, Matrix RAID, RAID-Ready. 23 votes, 14 comments. Max Raid Battles are a multiplayer feature that utilises the Dynamax Feature. On different sides I found a lot of threads regarding the RAID5 speed problems with the IRST software and some of them seem to be fixed. (Just in case you weren't sure: It is possible to get max raid shinies without exploits. Installed is the latest driver version from the Intel Download side (10.1.0.1008). But seriously, when a Magikarp is more useful … I was fighting a G Max Charizard and the Jolteon that accompanied me went for a double kick instead of any of its electric moves and essentially cost us the battle. Plus, it's one of the few times you get to team up with your friends and work together to defeat an … We’ve all heard of the infamous Solrock and the borderline useless Wobbuffet. I am currently running out of ideas to find the reason for my RAID 5 Performance problem with the IRST system. Initially I set up the RAID5 from the configuration screen just after the BIOS (64kb stripe), and then in Windows 7 x64 I used the IRS software to initialize the drive. Getting true info from Intel about the problems seems as promising as squeezing water from a rock (citing another victim of RST problems) and while I am quite sure there exists a good reason which I could find with some time I simply do not have access to the necessary hardware for the required time of several weeks to put some benchmarks and analysis on this bitch. I think so. Wish the write perf wasn't so sub-par, but I can live with it. One of Pokémon Sword and Shield’s big new features is raids, where up to four players can go up against a powerful monster. ... Let me decide if they send their stupid useless pokemon back out. Good enough for the file services they provide anyways. So look out for that. right now a Z87 system with 3x3000GB+60GB SSD-Cache. On the other hand there are sometimes problems with some other systems with incredibly low write performance when the cache runs full, usually around 20-40MB/s and depending on the size of your RAM- and SSD-cache this usually shows up after 2-30GB of writing data, e.g. Discussion. Certainly it was simpler than the route I took. How do I know what stripe/cluster/offset/alignment etc I need to set and how would I set them? 10.9k. E.G. ... Max Centiscorch is unbeatable with the CPU. This should make sure that the RAID system is in power safe mode, most of the idle time. Currently the "Initialization" is running, but after 24 hours it has just reached 30%. With this setup I am currently getting around 450-490 MB/s read speed which is great, however my write speed is around 30-40 MB/s?! It's almost the same except that it uses a strip size of 64K. This information covers what the Intel® VROC software is able to support. Surprisingly I managed to do just fine in Max Raid Battles even with the shitty NPCs. Our goal is to highlight those storage patterns for RAID levels 0/1/10/5 and explain how each pattern affects the performance of the storage solution. So, first you MUST ENABLE DISK WRTIE CACHE in Windows OS (server 2008) to have reasonable performance in Intel RST Raid 5. Used Software: Win-7 64 Bit(Business), smartrctl, ATTO Disk Benchmark. Hard to believe I know, I’ve seen him use it once, and that was yesterday. It will take 5 days to initialize the array... is this normal? Win7 is installed on a single SSD which is connected to the first SATA port of the other SATA Controller. If you manage to make RST-RAID5 run fast then it uses VERY little CPU and runs VERY fast. As Worldie said, the max raid shinies are through an exploit with the system clock and rng manipulation, and so are legal. When weak or useless NPCs use moves like Helping Hand and Rock Polish, they waste turns and, since many of them are generally weak or have type disadvantages to the boss's moves, they bring the player closer being blown out of the den by fainting from one hit. Except maybe things are smoother with 64k stripe in general. The player can start a Max Raid Battle by interacting with an active Pokémon Den, indicated by a beam of light shooting up from it.If a den is inactive, the player can throw a Wishing Piece into it to summon a Dynamax Pokémon.. May be someone can help me. • 256GB, 512GB per DIMM • 1866, 2133, 2400, 2666 MT/s • Up to 6.14TB max, (7.68TB max with DCPMM and LDRIMM) iDRAC 9 with Lifecycle Controller The new embedded system management solution features hardware and firmware inventory and In the Wild Area, you'll often find areas where a Dynamaxed Pokémon can be found. But none of these tips fixed my problem. Max # of DIMMs DIMM (Dual In-line Memory Module) is a series of DRAM (Dynamic Random-Access Memory) IC's … I know this thread is a bit old but I have just read the lot and have a few questions about my latest PC build. Intel ICH10R: SATA-300 -connectors: 6 x 7pin Serial ATA - 6 devices - RAID 0 / RAID 1 / RAID 10 / RAID 5 Marvell 88SE9128: SATA-600 -connectors: 2 x 7pin Serial ATA - 2 devices if I start another raid with an AI magikarp I sWEAR-Make sure to check out the amazing original artist!!! Im using a lvl 100 Coalossal and im lucky to get it to half health when I play with the CPU. If you stick with 4 drives, there is no combination of settings that will write to the drives in array evenly, regardless of what your forumulas tell you. Each RAID level processes storage I/O in a different manner and stores data in a specific pattern across a set of RAID member disks. AMD is still using solder between the die and IHS on the Ryzen CPUs for improved thermal transfer. What level are the Pokemon are you using to raid with? Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts. Using CrystalMark, the max Read speed we're seeing is 12MB/s, with write as 7MB/s. Like the CPU can be really bad at times (hi there Wobbuffet) but you should be able to carry most of the time if you are strong enough. - Played around with different stripe sizes. I was going to try to explain why (again) late last night, but lost the post I was trying to write and gave up. Wish the write perf wasn't so sub-par, but I can live with it. But seriously, when a Magikarp is more useful than you, you know you’re unhelpful trash. By using multiple disks (at least 2) at the same time, this offers superior I/O performance. I don’t even mind the Magikarp since it actually attacks, Fun fact: Martin’s solrock knows psychic. If the capacity hit is more important than the difference in write speed you get, stick with 4 drives. r/pokemon is an unofficial Pokémon fan community. However, before initializing it in IRS I initialized it in Windows so I can see 8.5TB drive in My Computer whilst the initializing through IRS is still going on. Seeing as how my write performance is greater than a single disk, I am thrilled, as I know others have encountered abysmal write scores that didn't even muster the bandwidth of an individual disk. To enable disk wite cache folow this guide: http://www.windowsreference.com/windows-server-2008/enable-disk-write-caching-to-improve-performance... http://www.windowsreference.com/windows-server-2008/enable-disk-write-caching-to-improve-performance... Bump. Also on some Windows machines it runs very fast, e.g. Forget what you are reading all over the net, there is a lot of information that looks important, but doesn't pertain to your specific situation. Your table is the only one that worked for me and now I finally have a very fast RAID5! - Read/Write checked the single disks(not array configuration) by copying 100 GB of data across. Tho that’s prob cause I always use strong pkmn for them and now have ones specifically for Max Raid Battles only. Press J to jump to the feed. useless RAID5 performance with rapid storage-technology, Sposta questo Discussione per l'utente corrente. Write cache is enabled etc. • RAID 0, 1, 5, and Non-RAID • SATA HDD and SSD devices only • Up to twenty four 2.5 inch hot-plug SATA HDDs or SSDs • Software RAID is through the Intel C620 chipset • Software RAID solution is supported on Linux and Windows For details, see the Storage section. I know it's software raid, but I was expecting a bit more performance than that. Both times, the Pokémon in question had a completely useless held item- Eviolite on the Luxray, Reaper Cloth on the Mimikyu. RAID 10 stripes data across the primary disks in a drive group and then duplicates that data to the secondary disks in a drive group. I got a GA-H57M-USB3 Board , because it seems to be a good choice for a low power PC in combination with the i5 650 when using the build in GP of the CPU. my P35/ICH10 runs 3x1500GB with 220MB/s read and 180MB/s write. Archived [Pokemon Sw/Sh] CPU players in Max Raid battles are garbage. Both CPUs are equipped with two CPU Complexes (CCX) with 16 MB shared L3 Cache and 512 MB L2 Cache per core. When that took abolsutely ages I deleted the volumes and recreated it in IRS with write caching enabled and that too is taking about 75 minutes per 1%. I want to install raid same nvme drives in both 1. We’ve all heard of the infamous Solrock and the borderline useless Wobbuffet. If that still doesn't get what you want, well you could always buy me a plane ticket to whereever, I'll fix it for ya. The board is running fine and power consumption is nearly as expected, but the problem is that the RAID5 mode seems to be useless because it is extremely slow. When in the aforementioned RAID config, I am getting 235 MB/sec for my reads and 110 MB/sec for my writes. RAID 10 (a combination of RAID 1 and RAID 0) provides superb system perfor-mance and system security. In some cases I have been able to make the problem go away after reinstalling and reformating several times and chosing different RAID-stripe and NTFS-cluster sizes. - Used only 3 disks in the array (idea: 2TB limit) . [Pokemon Sw/Sh] CPU players in Max Raid battles are garbage. Also a P55 with 3x2000GB runs at 280MB/s read and 200MB/s write, never using more than 2-3% of a single core, no matter what scenario. What, you don't like being teamed with a Magikarp, Wobbuffet, and Solrock? Close. When my other raid-5 array finishes initializing I'll post its performance numbers as well. This driver package supports the operating system/boot device included in the RAID array and standalone NVMe boot device with a separate SATA RAID storage array. RAID performance can be difficult to understand, especially as distinct RAID levels use varying techniques and behave rather differently in practice. http://technikaffe.de/anleitung-219-intel_rapid_storage__beste_kombination_aus_stripe_und_clustergro... http://technikaffe.de/anleitung-219-intel_rapid_storage__beste_kombination_aus_stripe_und_clustergro... StefanTA your guide is awesome! Please for the love of all that is holy, throw Martin’s Solrock into a ravine! I think an indeep analysis about Intel RST is overdue. New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast. This has been around for years with nearly all chipsets and it affects everybody. http://www.windowsreference.com/windows-server-2008/enable-disk-write-caching-to-improve-performance... http://www.intel.com/support/chipsets/imsm/sb/cs-009337.htm#. Intel RST is software raid, it doesn't have a dedicated CACHE to write disk (like a dedicated Raid hardware). Max Memory bandwidth is the maximum rate at which data can be read from or stored into a semiconductor memory by the processor (in GB/s). Now, you need to enable RST write cahce. Up to 6 per CPU socket. Max 12 for 2S configuration. But enabling RST raid cahe (from Intel RST software) is useful if you don't enable Windows disk write cahe also. I currently use 4 x 1TB 2,5" Toshiba disks. features in SwSh is the introduction of Max Raid battles. The theoretcial maximum here is 300 MB/sec read and 210 MB/sec write, so writes are doing a lot worse than reads. I do not believe that this is normal? Hi, Just taken delivery of a PowerEdge R630 which has a Perc S130 RAID card with 4*250Gb 7200 RPM SATA disks in a RAID5 array and we're experiencing unexpected slow performance. So hardware and cabling must be fine. There are two types of performance to look at with all storage: reading and writing. This is better than the 128k strip size, as write performance is 43% better. I randomly got a shiny cursola raid … In a RAID 0 system data are split up into blocks that get written across all the drives in the array.